5 biggest challenges facing wholesalers in 2026 and how to overcome them
Table of Contents
New commerce connects
Find out how Linnworks can help grow your business.
Wholesale has always been a margins game. You win on volume, relationships, and operational discipline, not on brand storytelling or viral moments. But the last eighteen months have compressed the margin for error in ways that go beyond the usual cycle. Tariff volatility, AI-assisted buyers, compliance pressure, and a structural inventory accuracy problem most operators haven’t fully confronted are all landing at the same time.
1. The margin math has gotten brutal
According to Thomson Reuters’ 2026 supply chain research, 39% of trade professionals are now absorbing tariff costs rather than passing them to customers, up from just 13% in 2024. That tripling in 12 months means a lot of wholesalers have made a calculated bet: raise prices and risk losing accounts, or eat the cost and protect relationships.
The problem with eating the cost indefinitely is that it changes the structural economics of the business. You’re funding your customers’ margin at the expense of your own.
The more durable response is tighter cost visibility by SKU. Most wholesalers can tell you their overall margin. Far fewer can tell you, in real time, which SKUs are margin-positive after factoring in landed cost, storage, and handling. That gap is where absorbed tariff costs quietly destroy profitability.
Getting to SKU-level cost clarity requires clean inventory data connected to your order operations. When those two systems talk to each other, you can make pricing decisions with actual numbers behind them, not estimates. You can also identify which product lines are genuinely worth defending and which are propped up by a pricing model that predates the current tariff environment.
2. Your buyers are using AI before they talk to you
Linnworks’ 2026 State of Commerce Operations report found that fewer than 5% of retailers in either the US or UK report no AI usage at all. AI has moved from experimentation to execution, and the divide is no longer who uses it, but who has the data foundation to trust it with real decisions.
State of Commerce Ops Report
Insights from 200+ retailers on automation, inventory visibility, marketplace strategy and global growth.
What that means operationally: your buyers are showing up to conversations having already done comparative analysis. An AI engine has scraped your product data, your competitors’ pricing, and whatever structured information it can find about availability, lead times, and minimum order quantities. If your product data is inconsistent across channels, you’re feeding that engine garbage, and the AI is drawing conclusions from it.
Buyers whose AI surfaces bad data about your catalog may never ask a follow-up question. The filtering happens before you know you’re being evaluated.
3. Digital channels reward the ones willing to get serious
For wholesalers managing large catalogs across multiple channels, product data consistency is genuinely hard to maintain manually. That usually means centralizing how product data gets created, updated, and syndicated. What a buyer’s AI sees on your portal should match what’s in your EDI feeds and distributor portals. Inconsistencies that were previously minor nuisances are now disqualifying.
45% of B2B buyers are dissatisfied with current ecommerce experiences, while 65% say they’d pay more for a better digital journey.
The operational question isn’t whether to invest in digital. It’s whether your back-end operations can support the experience your buyers expect. A slick portal that can’t show real-time stock availability, or that shows one price to a customer and processes the order at a different one, creates more distrust than a clunky portal that at least tells the truth.
4. Businesses have a broken foundation
Multichannel order management is the unsexy foundation that makes the digital experience credible. When a buyer places an order at 10pm, you need accurate inventory, correct pricing tiers, and a confirmation with a realistic lead time. Delivering that consistently across a B2B portal, a marketplace presence, and a direct sales channel requires those channels to share a single source of truth for inventory and pricing. Linnworks builds that single source of truth, so when an order comes in through any channel, stock levels, pricing, and fulfillment routing all update from the same place rather than creating the discrepancies that generate support tickets.
Anchor Group’s wholesale inventory research found that 58% of businesses operate below an 80% inventory accuracy threshold. That means one in five items you think you have, you either don’t have or can’t locate. For a wholesaler fulfilling B2B orders where customers plan production schedules around your delivery promises, that’s a relationship problem as much as a data one.
Your team manually verifies large orders before confirming them, and safety stock accumulates on lines where the data can’t be trusted. Extra lead time gets baked into every promise to give yourself room to absorb errors. All of that burns time and margin, and none of it scales.
Inventory management savings calculator
Uncover the cost of your mis-ships, out of stocks and lack of labor efficiency with our inventory management savings calculator.
5. Compliance is no longer a once-a-year task
Fixing inventory accuracy isn’t glamorous work. It typically involves regular cycle counting, barcode scanning at receiving and pick/pack, and better bin location discipline. The data needs to update in real time, not nightly. If your current system can’t tell you where a specific SKU is physically located in your warehouse right now, that’s the starting point. Inventory accuracy at the SKU and location level is the prerequisite for everything else: reliable digital channels, accurate purchasing, sensible safety stock decisions. You can’t automate your way out of a data accuracy problem.
Large buyers now have their own ESG commitments, their own reporting obligations, and their own audit timelines, and they’re pushing that work upstream to their suppliers. Assent, a compliance data platform, tracked one supply chain partner that reported a 500% year-over-year increase in compliance data requests from customers in a single year. That’s just one company, but the direction is consistent with what procurement teams across manufacturing and wholesale are describing.
Most wholesalers still treat sustainability compliance as an annual reporting exercise, something that lives in a spreadsheet and gets pulled out when a customer asks about it. That model is breaking. If you can’t respond to a major account’s compliance request with specific, verifiable data, you become a liability in their supply chain rather than a partner in it.
The starting point is a product-level audit. Do you know the origin of every item in your catalog? Do you have documentation on materials, chemical compliance, and carbon footprint that you could pull up this week if a key account asked? Most wholesalers have patchy answers. The fix requires the same structural work that underlies inventory accuracy: assign ownership, build a data collection process, and connect compliance documentation to your product records so it’s retrievable on demand rather than reconstructed under pressure. The volume of requests is only going up, and the wholesalers who can respond quickly will have a meaningful advantage over those still pulling data from a shared drive.
Where to start
These five challenges aren’t independent. Fix inventory accuracy and your pricing decisions get grounded in real landed costs rather than estimates. That same clean product data powers reliable digital channels and gives you the product record foundation compliance documentation can actually build on. One operational investment, three problems that get easier.
Start where the bleeding is worst, and build from there.
Get a Linnworks demo – automate inventory and orders faster
Book a Linnworks demo and see how it simplifies inventory, orders, and fulfillment. Get started today and optimize your eCommerce operations.
FAQ
A wholesale pricing strategy is the method a wholesale business uses to set prices on products sold in large quantities to retailers and wholesale buyers. The approach you choose, whether cost-based pricing, tiered pricing, or differentiated pricing, directly determines your profit margin. If your wholesale cost, including production cost, overhead expenses, and landed cost, isn’t fully accounted for before you set a price, you can end up funding your customers’ margin at the expense of your own. With tariff volatility compressing margins across the sector right now, getting this math right at the SKU level matters more than it did even eighteen months ago.
Keystone pricing sets the wholesale price at roughly half the retail price, giving the retailer a 50% markup. It’s simple, but it doesn’t account for your actual overhead cost or production cost, which means it can understate your true wholesale pricing in high-cost categories like wholesale clothing or food articles. Absorption pricing takes the opposite approach: it builds all overhead expenses into the cost price before adding a desired profit margin on top. For wholesale suppliers managing complex catalogs across non-food and food articles, absorption pricing tends to produce more defensible numbers, especially when retail inflation and input costs are moving quickly.
Volume discounts and tiered pricing are standard tools for incentivizing bulk orders and rewarding wholesale buyers who purchase in large quantities. The risk is offering better prices on bulk without knowing whether those SKUs can actually support the discount at your current wholesale cost. Tiered pricing works when it’s built on clean cost data: you know your overhead cost per unit at each volume tier, you’ve modeled the margin at each threshold, and the discount is structured to increase your total profit even as the unit price drops. Without that foundation, volume discounts become a way of accelerating margin erosion rather than rewarding your best customers.
Competitive pricing means setting your wholesale prices in reference to what competitors charge for comparable wholesale products. It’s a reasonable starting point, but it becomes a problem when your competitor pricing decisions aren’t anchored to your own cost structure. If a competitor can offer lower prices because their production cost or overhead expenses are genuinely lower, matching them is a margin problem waiting to happen. Differentiated pricing is often the more sustainable answer: instead of chasing competitor pricing on identical products, you compete on reliability, data accuracy, digital channel experience, and fulfillment consistency, factors that wholesale buyers increasingly weigh alongside price.
Retail inflation and movements in the wholesale price index signal shifts in input costs and market demand that should feed directly into your pricing strategy. When the wholesale price index rises, it typically reflects increasing production costs, overhead costs, or supply chain pressure that will eventually reach the retailer if it hasn’t already. Negative inflation creates the opposite pressure: retail prices fall, retailers push for better prices from suppliers, and wholesale margins compress from the customer side. Monitoring both gives you an early indicator of when your current wholesale prices need revisiting, before a major account asks for a discount you haven’t modeled.